Sunday, September 30, 2007

There's Nothing to Win in Iraq by The Southern Avenger

Lindsey Graham and John McCain say that that the war has "republican" stamped all over it. If the U.S. doesn't "win" it they will be out of power, and therefore, you should support them. Lindsey Graham prefers for more Iraqi civilians to die and for more Americans to die, than for his party to loose power. He deserves to be shut up!

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Do you support amnesty for illegal immigrants? If so, don’t call the S.C. Republican Party.

Unfortunately for party officials, the phone has been ringing since anonymous signs have popped up around Columbia and other metropolitan areas.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Bush's legacy will be mistake after mistake

South Carolina is a nation. We fought wars against two empires. Lindsey Graham wants us to fight for his.

"If you want your grandchildren, their children and their children's grandchildren serving in Iraq, you should vote for Sen. Lindsey Graham and Rep. Joe Wilson and whomever the Republicans nominate for president in 2008. These Republicans are determined to keep the Bush war in Iraq going for another 50 years.

The Bush presidency is a series of mistakes."

Read more

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH

the 1st Amendment

The Police State is here. The League of the South has seen it coming closer and closer. There is no time left stand back and watch. If you believe in freedom of speech than get out on the streets and exercise it!

Citizens Arrested for commiting FREE SPEECH in Washington DC

"Free Speech" when Lindsey Graham speeks.

"That's not what I asked you"


Peggy Noonan wrote the following last year about a simple incident that speaks volumes. Bush talks like a thug.

The latest example of a lack of grace in Washington is the exchange between Jim Webb and President Bush at a White House Christmas party. Mr. Webb did not want to pose with the president and so didn't join the picture line. Fair enough, everyone feels silly on a picture line. Mr. Bush approached him later and asked after his son, a Marine. Mr. Webb said he'd like his son back from Iraq. Mr. Bush then, according to the Washington Post, said: "That's not what I asked you. How's your son?" Mr. Webb replied that's between him and his son.

For this Mr. Webb has been roundly criticized. And on reading the exchange I thought it had the sound of the rattling little aggressions of our day, but not on Mr. Webb's side. Imagine Lincoln saying, in such circumstances, "That's not what I asked you." Or JFK. Or Gerald Ford!

"That's not what I asked you" is a sentence straight from cable TV, from which many Americans are acquiring an attitude toward public and even private presentation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you desire to remain civilized, PLEASE unplug your TV. However, if you think that Bush is a decent man, it is already too late for you.

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH



Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Lindsey "Bigots" Graham must go!


Fresh from "Bigots" Graham

Ironically South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham blurted out the truth:

"We’re playing yo-yo — political yo-yo — with people’s lives."

Graham has no shame for abusing our troops as roving targets in this asinine occupation when most Iraqis now approve of attacks on American troops.


Read More

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH


Lindsey "Bomb Bomb" Graham is just like John "BombBomb" McCain. Have nukes will travel.


Last week, Joe Lieberman was crushed when Gen. BetrayUs refused to embrace Lieberman's demand for war on Iran.

So did Lieberman show his respect for the Great General and give up? Absolutely not.

He called his warmongering Republican friends Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Norm Coleman (R-MN), and persuaded them to co-sponsor an amendment to put the entire Senate on record demanding war with Iran.

Jonathan Schwarz has the exact language:

(3) that it should be the policy of the United States to combat, contain, and roll back the violent activities and destabilizing influence inside Iraq of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its foreign facilitators such as Lebanese Hezbollah, and its indigenous Iraqi proxies;

(4) to support the prudent and calibrated use of all instruments of United States national power in Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military instruments, in support of the policy described in paragraph (3) with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies.

Schwarz correctly adds:

If something like this passes both the House and Senate, I think Bush could legitimately argue that between it, the War Powers Act and the 2001 and 2002 Authorizations to Use Military Force, he has all the authority he needs to attack Iran.

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH



islandpacket.com | Support for old strategy raises doubts about new

COULD IT BE THAT SOMEBODY BENEFITS BY HAVING THIS WAR CONTINUE?

Read this;

In defending President Bush's surge in his Sept. 18 column, Sen. Lindsey Graham made the following astonishing admission:"The old strategy gave us no chance to avoid defeat in Iraq."

In other words, the plan the Bush administration pursued from 2003 through 2006, the plan that Graham and other Republicans in the Congress unfailingly defended, "gave us no chance to avoid defeat."

Now Graham asks us to believe that the advocates of that doomed strategy have finally got it right, that now they have a plan for victory.

Read more.

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH










READ MORE

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Aiken Standard


SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH




Link

Monday, August 27, 2007


View Larger Map

Graham to speak to Richland Co. GOP

Graham to speak to Richland Co. GOP

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham will speak Monday at the August meeting of the Richland County Republican Party executive committee.

Graham, a Seneca Republican, will give an address at 6 p.m. at the community room of the Suggs & Kelly building, 500 Taylor St., at the corner of Huger and Taylor streets in Columbia.

Graham has been widely criticized for his support of a controversial immigration reform bill that failed in the Senate.

He was censured Aug. 6 by the Greenville County executive committee


Linsissy will be there and so will a few of us.


SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH

Sunday, August 26, 2007

SCGOP: If Graham's The Best We've Got To Offer, Then Frankly, We Suck.

The Dump Lindsey Graham site says it well.

Some tough reflection yields the following: If Lindsey Graham is the best that the South Carolina GOP can offer in 2008, then we're in a world of hurt, friends.

Strom Thurmond and Carroll Campbell must roll over in their graves when Mr. Graham bows to Ted Kennedy and plays footsies with Hillary Clinton. The SC Democrat Party has made it clear that if it appears Graham is safe in 2008, they won't pitch a strong Democrat candidate. That sounds good until you hear the reason: They love Lindsey Graham, and consider him a practicing Democrat!



Mr. Graham has been censured by the Greenville County GOP, and dodged the same fate in Spartanburg only because the county chairman there used archaic technical procedures to prevent a vote on a proposed censure. More censures are in the works across the state. It is clear that Mr. Graham has lost the confidence of those he is supposed to represent.


READ MORE

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH

Friday, August 24, 2007

UPCOUNTRY SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH REPORT

Demonstration at Spartanburg County Republican Committeemans Meeting, Aug. 23, 2007


A call went out to attend this meeting and/or demonstrate for censure of Empire Senator Lindsey Graham (Republican, S.C.).

The meeting was held outdoors at an ice cream parlor on Blackstock Road.

The Repub’s sound system was awful and it appeared they turned the volume down during critical discussion. They don’t even try to hide their mean tricks.

The place was packed. We were stunned when the Chairman announced there weren’t enough committeemen to make a quorum. What a weasel. He said there would be no voting on business tonight. And they didn’t.

The main attraction of this meeting was a Greenville-style resolution, censuring of Sen. Lindsey Graham. The resolution was read (volume turned down) and was “put into the minutes” but no vote was allowed. We know how the vote would have gone. It was obvious there were more people for censuring Graham than against. The Empire has got to stop the momentum of censuring their chosen ones. Things could get out of hand for them in a hurry. They had to do something to stop this vote and buy some more time.

I’m sure the resolution will be back.

Ron Paul supporters were there in larger than usual numbers. Tee shirts, stickers, signs and banners were all around.

There were people passing out “Dump Lindsey” bumper stickers. All the “dump Lindsey” folks and Ron Paul supporters were in a good mood. We had a good time.

There were quite a few SCLoS’ers, doing their thing.

The Greenville and Spartanburg worthless, commie newspapers were on hand.

There were four identifiable Graham supporters. The continual scowls on their faces told us their thoughts on the event. They didn’t like all the anti-Lindsey signs and talk. One fat Graham-cracker went around taking photos of all anti-Lindsey demonstrators. I suppose we will now be on the “No-Fly” list the goons keep.

This event was still a defeat for Graham.

Patriots had a good showing.


SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

GOP rally in county might put Graham on hot seat

Lindsey Graham is a disgusting thing. Spartanburg knows this just as well as Greenville. Here's what one of his Greenville flunkies had to say about Spartanburg Republicans.

"There is no question that there is some unrest among the hard-core natives," said Chip Felkel, a Republican strategist in Greenville.

"But I hope logic and reason will rule the day. When it comes down to it, the guy's got $6 million in the bank. Unless all this ranting and raving turns into cash, it doesn't matter. And I sure hope Rick Beltram has more control over the party than that."

Did you catch that?

There's unrest among the natives! But don't let their ranting and raving worry you none, old Belt-Ram has the party natives under control (I HOPE). Besides, Senor Gramnisty's got a wad of pesos that would choke a goat! So tell the Republican voters bigots to shut up!

more




Thursday's forecast: The temperature should drop, but political heat will flare. And there's a slight chance of censure.

That evening, the Spartanburg County Republican Party will hold a rally mostly concerned with presidential politicking, but another hot topic should be U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham's quest for re-election.

Graham
has drawn heat on the home front for several controversial positions, including siding with Arizona Sen. John McCain on the failed immigration reform deal that rocked Congress - and the Republican voting base - this summer. Opponents of the bill, such as fellow U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., called it "amnesty."

Read more.

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH

Monday, August 20, 2007

Christians, Obey Romans 13 By Opposing George Bush!

Bush is not yet il Ducce, though he wants to be and very well, soon, may be. Should we respect his edicts? Should we obey them?

The following passage points out that Christian obedience is to God.

Remember that every apostle of Christ (except John) was killed by hostile civil authorities opposed to their endeavors. Christians throughout church history were imprisoned, tortured, or killed by civil authorities of all stripes for refusing to submit to their various laws and prohibitions. Did all of these Christian martyrs violate God’s principle of submission to authority?


So, even the great prophets, apostles, and writers of the Bible(including the writer of Romans Chapter 13) understood that human authority–even civil authority–is limited.

Plus, Paul makes it clear that our submission to civil authority must be predicated on more than fear of governmental retaliation. Notice, he said, “Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.” Meaning, our obedience to civil authority is more than just “because they said so.” It is also a matter of conscience. This means we must think and reason for ourselves regarding the justness and rightness of our government’s laws.


Obedience is
not automatic or robotic. It is a result of both rational

deliberation and moral approbation.


Therefore, there are times when civil authority may need to be resisted. Either governmental abuse of power or the violation of conscience (or both) could precipitate civil disobedience. Of course, how and when we decide to resist civil authority is an entirely separate issue. And I will reserve that discussion for another time.


Beyond that, we in the United States of America do not live under a monarchy. We have no king. There is no single governing official in this country. America’s “supreme Law” does not rest with any man or any group of men. America’s “supreme Law” does not rest with the President, the Congress, or even the Supreme Court. In America, the U.S. Constitution is the “supreme Law of the Land.” Under our laws, every governing official publicly promises to submit to the Constitution of the United States. Do readers understand the significance of this distinction? I hope so.

Read the whole thing.

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH

IT'S ALL ABOUT ME AND MY EXQUISITE CONSCIENCE

In Hard Call John McCain explains that he once was lost, but Hallejuah, now he's found!

"When I ran for president in 2000, I took a position I knew to be wrong on a controversial public issue that had a moral component because I thought it might help me win the primary in the state the issue concerned."


Here is what John McCain really means.

I lied - well actually, I was given bad advice (to lie).
I regret that I lied,
because
1. it didn't work ("did me little political good") and
2. it's wrong to lie ("caused me to be ashamed of myself").


John McCain is so self-critical, so self-revealing...so blinded by pride that his confession unintentionally revels a serious moral weakness. In lumping the moral failure of lying, together with the tactical failure of lying ineffectively, he reveals that, while claiming to regret having lied, what he truly regrets is that lying didn't pay off, further revealing, of course, that he is still...un...lying.. Furthermore, John McCain is so bloated with self-importance that he considers even his feigned shame to be newsworthy.

The following imaginary monologue attempts to reveal what McCain's faux contrition tries to attenuate. I hope I haven't been to lenient:

Liberal reporter: Senator McCain, while campaigning in South Carolina you stated that you considered that whatever flag they chose to fly, and wherever they chose to fly it, it was their own business and none of yours. Later you appeared to flip flop. How would you characterize your contradictory statements on this issue.

John McCain: I'm really sorry that I took your enemy's side instead of your side on this issue, even though I really believed that your side was the right side all along, because some people had told me that it would pay off if I lied to them, but it didn't pay off, and so, after that happened I went back to your enemy and told them that I had lied to them.

Liberal reporter: So, had your ploy succeeded in tricking our enemy into believing you to be their friend, resulting, as you intended, in their chosing you as their leader, what would you have said to us to make us realize that you were, in fact, not their friend, but ours?

John McCain: After I got their endorsement I would have become remorseful, and at least when talking to your people, I would have equivocated. You know what I mean.

Liberal reporter: But that didn't happen.

John McCain: No, after they rejected me I knew right away that they were wrong! And I told them this publicly so that you could hear me when I told them that I had lied to them and had never really been their friend at all, but their enemy instead, all along, and had always been on your side, really.

After that I was really ashamed of myself for pretending to be on the side of your enemies. And that's the truth."

Liberal reporter: Thank you Senator McCain.

Aikhe


SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH








Sunday, August 19, 2007

HOW LOW CAN YOU GO?

The Sept. 11 attacks prompted Americans to rally for George W. Bush, but the war in Iraq is wearing.


Sources: Gallup, AP, WSJ.com research

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH

Friday, August 17, 2007

NEVER FORGET NEVER FORGIVE



The good old AP was there to take our picture. And mikevotes liked it. John McCain didn't, though.




Born at the Crest of the Empire
Friday, August 17, 2007
Picture of the Day - 2




Members of the South Carolina League of the South, wait Monday, Aug. 13, 2007, in Columbia, S.C., prior to the arrival of Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain. (AP Photo/Brett Flashnick)

They're still mad about the confederate flag issue from 2000.

posted by mikevotes at 5:26 PM | 1 comments

Kettle, meet Pot


Actually, we are
still mad about the Confederate flag issue from 2000...1860.

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH


Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Unforgivable Lindsey Graham

This comment about Lindsey Graham's tactics hits the nail on the head.

The Southern Avenger reminds us of just how bad Lindsy Graham is.


The Southern Avenger
10 August 2007

Just one week after amnesty bill supporter Senator John McCain did an about-face on illegal immigration in an attempt to salvage his floundering presidential campaign, his ally in that fight, South Carolina's own Senator Lindsey Graham, took his cue. Standing shoulder to shoulder with Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff on Tuesday, Graham looked like a whipped dog, as he talked tough about enforcing our borders and did his best to convince SC voters he really was loyal to them, after spitting in their faces just weeks ago. Back then, when voters called the Senator, Lindsey 'Grahamnesty,' he retaliated by calling them 'bigots.' When one poll showed that 63% of Graham's constituents opposed amnesty and that his own approval rating had plummeted to 31%, a defiant Graham spokesman insisted that 'LindseyGraham has never governed by the polls.' Well he does now."

Read more.

THE SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH

Sunday, August 12, 2007

American Thinker: Lindsey Graham's About-face

This is an excerpt from an exceptional essay found here about what the hell happened. The once and never again Lindsey Graham is what he is and now that South Carolina knows him she doesn't like Lindsey Graham one bit.

"The fallout experienced by Graham following his wholehearted endorsement of amnesty for illegal aliens and his conspicuous pandering to La Raza was extensive. According to an Insider Advantage/Majority Opinion poll, 63% of his constituents disapproved of his support for S.1639. His approval rating plummeted to 31% and campaign contributions critical for the senator's re-election in 2008 ground to a halt. The blogosphere responded with a proliferation of 'Dump Lindsey Graham' websites, with one displaying a Lindsey Graham countdown clock. In response, a Graham spokesman commented with flagrant disdain that 'Lindsey Graham has never governed by the polls - real or bogus - and is not about to start now."

SOUTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH
 
site statistics